Uh oh. Seems like Margaret Sanger 2.0 in her purdy pink kicks just stepped in it.
Despite claiming not to know the details of the Gosnell case (psst... she knows and she's lying), she thinks women who are appalled by late-term abortions and support the bans are just plain old ignorant:
The Weekly Standard: What do you make of polls showing that a majority of women support these late-term bans? There have been a few polls--Washington Post, Huffington Post, different polls--that show women support this. What do you think of those polls?
DAVIS: I again think that a lot of people don't really understand the landscape of what's happening in that arena today and what an incredibly small percentage of procedures take place there, but, ah...Got it? You're just ill-informed. Of course you don't understand that at 20 weeks abortion procedures require chemicals so strong that often times when the baby is pushed from the uterus, it's decapitated. Or its born-alive in which case it probably goes to die in a closet or in the case of Kermit Gosnell, flushed down a toilet.
No, you couldn't possibly understand the ramifications what happens to life when you slaughter a child at 20 weeks into gestation, you silly ignoramus!
If Mrs. Davis weren't so awe-struck with her own presence on television and media clips she'd take a second to understand what exactly a 20 week abortion procedure entails. Actually that would require self-awareness which this sickening excuse for a woman and human being isn't capable of possessing.
Maybe her argument is that 'Well, this happens so infrequently, so really the impact is minimal, right?' In which case, if that's her best argument.... ick. This woman is truly a monster.
It's time to start connecting the dots of those cut from the same cloth.
Margret Sanger = Wendy Davis = Hillary Clinton.
If we play our cards right on this we educate the public on Sanger's pro-eugenics stance and tie that back to the left's current cult of personalities Davis and Clinton.
Out: Pink Shoes
In: Black Heart